Sharpening Your Research Niche
Finding Your Golden Thread While Preserving Intellectual Breadth (Part 1)
One year ago, I sat across from a promising junior faculty member who was visibly stressed. He had just received feedback from a mentor that left him questioning everything about his research trajectory.
“They said my work lacks focus,” he told me. “But I don’t get it. I’ve published on community economic development, environmental justice, law and social movements, and legal education. How is that unfocused?”
I looked at his impressive list of publications. Each piece was solid, well-researched, and important. But as I read through the abstracts, I began to see what his mentors meant.
His projects were impressive individually.
Some explored the material effects of racial capitalism on community economic development. Others analyzed how private law distributes environmental harms and resources. And still others considered how social movements and cultural narratives can reshape legal understanding.
But taken together, they didn’t yet reveal a single, connecting thread.
“Tell me,” I asked, “what’s the golden thread that connects these projects?”
He paused for a long time. “I’m not sure if there is one.”
That conversation illustrates one of the most challenging dilemmas facing contemporary academics. How do you develop a focused research niche without boxing yourself into intellectual constraints that stifle your curiosity and growth?
Over the past few weeks, we’ve explored how to clarify your scholarly identity, craft your academic story, and build a digital presence that amplifies your work. Our goal was to “Clarify” who you are as a scholar and what you care about as an academic.
Now we’re moving into the “Accelerate” phase of building your academic brand, starting with the crucial task of sharpening your research focus while preserving the intellectual breadth that makes academic work exciting.
The scholars who have the greatest impact aren’t necessarily the most narrowly specialized. They’re the ones who can identify the connecting patterns across their diverse interests and communicate those connections clearly to others.
Let’s explore how.
The Focus Dilemma
Academic training pulls us in contradictory directions.
Graduate school encourages us to explore widely, to read across disciplines, to follow intellectual curiosity wherever it leads. And we’re rewarded for asking big questions and making unexpected connections.
But academic careers reward specialization. Tenure committees want to see “a clear and focused research agenda.” Grant agencies fund experts in specific areas. Conference organizers invite scholars known for their particular domain expertise. Publishers seek authors who can speak authoritatively on specific topics to defined audiences.
This creates what I call the focus dilemma: the intellectual curiosity that makes us good scholars can undermine our career advancement if we don’t learn how to channel it strategically.
The result is often one of several problematic patterns:
The Scatterer pursues every interesting question that crosses their path, producing solid work that lacks coherent direction. Their CV looks impressive in breadth but confusing in purpose.
The Constrainer artificially narrows their focus to an overly specific niche, producing technically proficient work that feels disconnected from their broader intellectual interests and societal concerns.
The Pendulum Swinger alternates between periods of scattered exploration and forced narrowing, never finding a sustainable balance between focus and curiosity.
The Paralyzed Perfectionist becomes so concerned about making the “right” choice that they avoid making any choice at all, resulting in stalled productivity and missed opportunities.
None of these patterns serves your long-term scholarly mission. What you need is what I call “focused breadth”—the ability to pursue diverse intellectual interests within a coherent framework that others can understand and remember.
The Myth of the Single Question
Before we explore how to achieve focused breadth, let’s dispel a persistent myth in academic culture.
Some believe that every scholar should be able to identify “their one question”—the single research question that defines their entire career.
This myth is seductive because it promises simplicity.
If you can just identify your one question, the thinking goes, all your career decisions become clear. You pursue projects that address this question and decline those that don’t.
But this approach has serious limitations:
It’s artificially constraining. Most interesting questions are actually clusters of related questions. Forcing yourself to identify one question often means oversimplifying complex intellectual territory.
It ignores intellectual evolution. Your interests will change as you grow as a scholar. A single question identified early in your career may not sustain your interest or remain relevant throughout your academic life.
It misunderstands how knowledge advances. Breakthrough insights often come from connecting seemingly unrelated areas of inquiry. Excessive focus on one question can blind you to these connections.
It doesn’t match how most successful scholars actually work. When you examine the careers of influential academics, you rarely find single questions pursued in isolation. Instead, you find evolving clusters of related interests that develop over time.
A more useful approach is to think in terms of “scholarly threads”—connecting themes that run through your work and give it coherence without constraining your intellectual growth.
The Golden Thread Principle
Instead of searching for your one question, look for your golden thread.
This is the underlying theme or concern that connects your diverse interests and gives your work coherent direction.
Your golden thread might be:
A methodological approach that you bring to different substantive areas
A theoretical framework that illuminates various practical problems
A particular population or community whose experiences you examine across different contexts
A policy concern that manifests in multiple institutional settings
A philosophical question that arises in various legal or social domains
A historical pattern that repeats across different time periods or jurisdictions
The key is that your golden thread should be substantial enough to generate multiple research projects while specific enough to distinguish your work from others in your field.
Let me return to the junior faculty conversation I described earlier.
The truth is, that junior scholar was me.
After reflecting on what truly motivated my diverse research interests, I realized my golden thread was:
my concern with how the dominant cultural values and assumptions embedded in private law perpetuate economic injustice and racial hierarchy, and how imaginative and historical perspectives from marginalized communities can help reimagine law and political economy toward more liberatory ends.
Suddenly, my scattered work made sense:
My community economic development projects examined how racial capitalism shapes material inequalities in local economies.
My environmental justice research explored how private law structures the distribution of environmental harms and resources.
My work on law and social movements, law and literature, and Afrofuturism analyzed how cultural narratives and collective resistance reshape the meaning and possibilities of law.
My teaching and writing in legal education and the Reconstruction Constitution reflected how cultivating imaginative, justice-oriented approaches can train future legal actors to challenge these hierarchies.
Now my research projects were connected by a clear conceptual thread that explained why these topics mattered to me and how they related to each other.
Identifying Your Golden Thread
Finding your golden thread requires honest reflection about what actually motivates your scholarly work.
Here’s a systematic approach:
Step 1: Inventory Your Interests
List all your current research projects, recent publications, conference presentations, and planned future work. Include everything, even projects that seem unrelated to your “main” research area.
Don’t just list titles. Write a sentence or two about what each project explores and why it interests you.
Step 2: Look for Patterns
Examine your inventory for recurring themes, methods, populations, or concerns.
Ask yourself:
What kinds of problems consistently grab my attention?
What theoretical frameworks do I find myself returning to?
What populations or communities appear repeatedly in my work?
What methodological approaches do I prefer, and why?
What outcomes or changes do I hope my research will achieve?
What assumptions do I find myself challenging across different projects?
Step 3: Test for Emotional Resonance
Your golden thread should connect to something you genuinely care about, not just something that seems strategically smart.
Ask yourself:
Which of these themes makes me feel energized when I discuss it?
What problems keep me awake at night thinking about solutions?
What injustices or inefficiencies consistently frustrate me?
What potential discoveries genuinely excite me?
Step 4: Evaluate for Scholarly Viability
Your golden thread should be substantial enough to sustain a career’s worth of research while specific enough to distinguish your contribution.
Consider:
Is this thread broad enough to generate multiple research projects?
Is it specific enough that colleagues could identify me as an expert in this area?
Does it connect to important conversations in my field and related disciplines?
Are there sufficient research opportunities and funding sources in this area?
Step 5: Articulate Your Thread
Once you’ve identified your golden thread, practice articulating it clearly. You should be able to explain it in a few sentences to both specialists and non-specialists.
For example:
“My research examines how the dominant cultural values and assumptions embedded in private law shape economic and social hierarchies, and how imaginative and historical perspectives from marginalized communities can help reimagine law and political economy toward more liberatory ends.”
This Week’s Reflection
Take some time this week to identify your golden thread—the unifying theme that connects your diverse scholarly interests.
Here’s a structured approach:
List your last 5–7 research projects, presentations, or publication ideas. Include everything that has genuinely interested you, even if it seems unrelated to your “main” field.
For each item, write 2–3 sentences about why this topic matters to you personally. Don’t focus on its scholarly significance—focus on why you care about it.
Look for patterns across your responses. What themes, concerns, populations, or questions appear repeatedly?
Try to articulate one underlying thread that connects these interests. Complete this sentence: “Across all my research interests, I’m fundamentally concerned with …”
Test your thread by explaining it to a colleague in a different field. Can you articulate why this thread matters and how your various interests relate to it?
Remember: your golden thread doesn’t have to be perfect or permanent.
It just needs to be clear enough to guide your next few research decisions and coherent enough to help others understand what drives your work.
Next week, we’ll build on this foundation by exploring how to pursue intellectual breadth within focus, specifically discussing how to expand your ideas and collaborations without losing the coherence you’ve just begun to define.
Stay tuned!
Becoming Full,
P.S. As always, thank you for reading this week’s issue of The Tenure Track. If you found this article helpful, share it with a friend. If it moved you, consider supporting with a paid subscription or buying me a coffee. Together, let’s continue to build a supportive and creative academic community.
Your support helps me create content that serves fellow scholars on the path.